One of the best pieces of self-hosted software ever to exist.

Edit: This is Immich! for the folks who don’t know.

  • ShadowZone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Hmm. While I applaud Immich for existing at all, it kind of feels developed with not me as a user in mind. I have Terabytes of pictures I have taken over the couple of decades of my adult life. They are all neatly organized in folders on my NAS. There is no easy way to just tell Immich “oy, that folder structure? Turn it into albums” I am never going to manually put my 400k+ images into albums. And the folder view in the Android app is behind too many clicks to make it any fun using it.

    I guess I have to wrangle with the CLI or something to turn my folders into albums.

    But… why??? People use existing file structures. Make it easy for those to integrate into your app.

    Nothing of the sort on the roadmap either. Unless integrating folder structures into Immich albums gets more user friendly, I am reluctant to support the devs.

    I’ll probably do it anyway because as I said, I’m glad the project exists.

    Thanks.

  • whocares314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I really want to use (and support) this, but my case would be the server running on a windows pc with great hardware for all the ML/AI stuff and SSD database storage, but all my media on a NAS. (I’m a flight sim addict, Linux isn’t an option or I’d do it in a heartbeat) Last time I tried, I got the server running in docker pretty easily, but could not for the life of me get my media connected. Any chance that process has improved?

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I’m running it on in docker and I’ve connected it to my NAS mounted as a network drive. I set it up a few months ago, do it’s better since then.

      Don’t even worry about the hardware, I’ve got it set up on a raspberry Pi 5. It’ll take a while to do all the classification on your existing library, but new photos get classified fast enough. You’re unlikely to need to do a smart search immediately after you’ve taken the pic.

      For clarity, I’m not on Windows (obv, raspberry Pi), and I’m not using docker directly; I’m running HAOS on my pi, and I’m using the immich add-on. I know it uses docker, but I can’t tell you the exact command to run.

      • whocares314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s amazing. I have a Pi 4 currently running home assistant and pihole. Sounds like my pi family might be growing soon. Had no idea the 5 could run those features. Appreciate you

  • el_abuelo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I dont get the “server” vs “individual” support levels? Im an individual and I have a server…but presumably everyone buying immich has a server? Otherwise it’s pointless? Or is it expected that I buy a server package, plus an individual package for each and every user?

    I know it’s OSS and so any and all donations are voluntary - just the naming here confuses me.

    • sonofearth@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It is just Donation Tiers I think. Maybe the per user thing only hides the “Buy Immich” button for only that specific user.

    • dallen@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Server is meant for all users of a single server.

      So, you could buy 1-3 individual licenses or the server license for 4+ users.

  • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    im like maybe one of few people who barely take photos. its great because i dont need to worry about the costs of cloud storage

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I mostly set it up for a few major albums like my wedding album. Other than that it’s like 90% dog pictures lmao

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    One thing I don’t get, if someone could explain it to me, is what’s the point of immich over e.g. Nextcloud? Immich is just for photo and video, right? Why not just have a cloud file drive instead? To me, I feel like it’s a waste to have both, since I use Nextcloud to both sync my PC and as a secondary backup, in which case I’d have two copies of my photos on my home server if I wanted to use Immich as well. Am I missing something or is it for people with different workflows?

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Nextcloud is like Google drive, immich is like Google photos.
      You’d typically prefer to look at your photo albums in Google photos instead of Google drive.

    • SWW13@lemmy.brief.guru
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Because it has a lot of photo specific features:

      • face recognition: enables you to (mostly) automatic tagging of who’s in the photo
      • map of images, e.g. look at all the images you have taken in Italy
      • (local) AI to search images by keywords, e.g. “sunset at the beach”
      • memories: what happened on this day in the previous years

      These are just the ones on top of my head, but you’ll probably get the idea. If you just want to back up you photos then nextcloud is more than enough, but you’d probably enjoy the immich features once you used them.

      Regarding the two copies: you can use immich on an external library, so you don’t have to have to copies.

      It’s like asking why should I use paperless when I can just keep my documents as PDFs in my nextcloud.

      • Zanathos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The issue for me is that Nextcloud has these features as well with App add-ons. I have yet to try Immich because what’s more important for me is the actual backup\upload of my photos than actually browsing them. Maybe someday, but my self hosting initiatives typically involve me chasing a shiny red ball of a deployment, and Immich just isn’t shiny enough for me yet.

        • SWW13@lemmy.brief.guru
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Sure, if you just want upload / backup it’s not worth it. If your currently happy with nextcloud then there is no reason to try immich.

          But I highly recommend to sometimes view old photos to keep the memories alive.

          I haven’t looked into the nextlcoud add-ons, but didn’t have a great experience with the ones I tried so far. In general I’m not really happy with nextlcoud even for file sync / share, but I haven’t found any replacement, every thing else is much worse.

  • kalpol@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Seriously everyone pushes Immich so hard I’m a little suspicious of it now :D

    • ___@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      83k Github stars in under 4 years is definitely indicative of an excellent project

        • smoker@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          16 hours ago

          They are indicative of something. That something is just not always “this project is good”.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Correct: it’s like trying to equate “correct” with “popular”, and keeping in mind how the last US elections have turned out.

          But it’s good to be in a big network of other users with the same product, nonetheless.

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            You can just buy them, same way you can buy likes on any other platform. Don’t use them as any kind of metric.

            • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              22 hours ago

              You can but if you buy 80k people are gonna investigate and will easily find out you did. Stars are public. I have a folder on my computer with a dataset of 90% of all stars on github

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The fediverse is small and the Immich dev is one of our own, not surprising that it’s super popular

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s crazy good for something FREE. Like infinitely better than any major crop google apple etc because you KEEP your photos. Anything you upload to the cloud is being mined by them.

      The only thing I tell people is that you need a cloud backup.

      I have an automated nightly worker that zips all my photos encrypts them with a 32 character password and then uploads it to a bulk storage facility.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I found it a couple of months ago without hearing about it before. I was in an ideal place for a Google Photos replacement.

      There’s a couple of rough edges but it is, indeed, best-of-class.

    • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah :) Maybe give lychee a try :) it’s minimalist and does one thing, but it does it well !!!

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I used Photoprism years ago, so my knowledge is probably pretty outdated.

      My experience of Photoprism was that mobile was not tightly integrated. At the time I used Syncthing to sync photos — it worked ok for me, but I wasn’t going to set it up on my partner’s phone, for example.

      Immich Just Works on both mobile and desktop. Multi user is great, sharing is great, and the local ML and face detection work remarkably well.

      Whatever works for you is the best of course! Immich fits the bill for me, and it was very much worth it for me to “buy” it.

  • morethanevil@lemmy.fedifriends.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I got the supporter for free, because I donated to them before they joined FUTO. I donate frequently to opensource projects. This is a good way to say thanks to the devs 😊

    Even small donations are fine, so please donate to projects you enjoy 👍🏻

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    As someone who only used the stock synology app and has always wanted to try something else, what features and things does this do better? I am close to trying it out just to see. Im sure it will solve my 1 big issue where I can’t control the location of photos that default to my application storage, which is pretty small, instead of my actual storage array.

    • MinFapper@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Does everything Google photos does. Their app looks/feels exactly Google’s app, including sharing links. Assuming you’re running it on reasonably powerful hardware, it does all the same face recognition and ML based search that Google photos does.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        You don’t even need reasonably powerful hardware, I do it on my raspberry Pi 5. It just takes a little longer, which isn’t usually a problem except for the first time you import your library.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Does it have an Android app that will automatically back up photos and videos that I take? Is there a way to do it without exposing a bunch of stuff from my home network?

        • MinFapper@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yes, and yes.

          Their Android app feels like an exact clone of the Google Photos Android app.

          To access it remotely, you can use Tailscale like someone else mentioned. But you need to have Tailscale installed on everyone’s phones.

          You can also use a Cloudflare Tunnel to allow it to be accessed over the Internet without exposing anything from your home network directly to the Internet.

          The latter is useful when I want to share a secret link to a photo album after hanging out with people so everybody can upload the photos they took to one place (something I used to do a lot with Google Photos)

          • ridethisbike@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I currently have a Wireguard server setup on my router with the client on my phone that connects automatically any time I leave home (thanks Tasker!). This is essentially the same as the tail scale setup, right??

            Any idea how much that cloudflare tunnel costs?? I’d love to be able to share via a link rather than sending individual pictures, but my current setup really only allows it if that person is connected to my home wifi.