Apparently this will include Linux…

  • Peasley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This is being pushed by social media companies that don’t want to be responsible for age verification

  • TiredTiger@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And are they going to require ID to verify birth dates, or is this just going to be a drop down menu? If the latter, I’m pretty sure everyone’s birth date is 1/1/1901. I’m so tired of this surveillance shit masquerading as “save the children” nonsense. I hate to say it, but this is a parenting problem and if your kids are more tech-savvy than you are, they WILL find a way around these safegaurds.

  • amorangi@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    17 hours ago

    So define Operating System. Are embedded systems Operating Systems? Coz that’s going to cast a rather wide net.

    • ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Selective enforcement. Basically if they want to do shit to you they will prosecute you, otherwise they won’t bother.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I can’t wait for my microwave to ask me to take off my glasses, face the camera, and turn my head slowly from left to right.

  • stravanasu@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I wish one could implement “mental-age verification”. That way almost all politicians on Earth would be blocked from important technologies.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Or just refusing to run servers in California. Much like the US DRM encryption restrictions of the 90s. Where the whole Linux community just had distributions required parts of the download to happen in non US servers.

      A single, (although big and very active in Linux) state, will always have more limitations then a nation. The issue comes if it becomes US national. And then the US starts pushing other nations to sign agreements.

      Given at some point trumps harm to all international treaties will likely be repaired. Their may come a huge opportunity for US politicians to renegotiate international treaties.

      Assuming trust is ever returned.

  • Bullerfar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    12 hours ago

    All this age verification crap. Where is the fucking parents? I get that big tech has some responsability in all this. But how about we just make the responsible choice, of not letting a 8 year old near tiktok forinstance? Oh, it is just another excuse for private survailance you say? I see, I see…

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      As usual, the solution is education. Parental education needs to be prioritized imo. That said, I have no idea how we would implement such a thing. Most likely better general education would help at least.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I’m a parent and legit think that majority of parents should not have been parents and have no minimum required skill to raise a human being. It’s sad because it’s really not that hard but most people don’t think a day ahead when raising their kids and just follow a “vibe”, so spending a weekend on parental controls is an insurmountable task.

        • Bullerfar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          I AM a parent. And I will take the fight. Even though all other parrents will call me the “tin foil hat” rather that, than letting my child become a predators next meal online… These parrents has no idea what social media is all about. It’s a fucking addiction. The children can’t see this, this is why it’s our job to protect them.

    • spacetff@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Too bad that reproductive harm doesn’t work eliminating the birth of politicians

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Doesn’t even make sense. Virtually all Linux distros can function completely offline. How do you do age verification completely offline? Classic politician who doesn’t understand tech trying to look like they’re doing something to save the kids.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The only platforms for now where this might work are Windows, macOS, iOS, and stock Android, however as Muta hypothesized, if this extends to hardware-level, a law could just mandate SecureBoot and lock out the ability to implement custom keys, and then only allow a short list of state-approved OSes to boot on the hardware, which no doubt Windows would be on that short list.

      Similarly, all non-Apple mobile devices as an extension to that could be locked exclusively to stock Android, eliminating custom ROMs like LineageOS or GrapheneOS as an option entirely, let alone mobile Linux distros.

  • Eiri@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Linux distributions should react by asking users to confirm they’re not in California. They’ll backpedal fast.