I’ve been using Debian (and formerly Ubuntu) for many years.

But I’ve been wanting to tell people that I use Arch.

I’ve been considering the following distros:

  • Arch
  • Cachy
  • Manjaro
  • Any others?

I’m leaning towards Arch or Cachy. This is for a mediocre laptop that I’m planning to use as a media center: Kodi, Retroarch, Steam, etc. Should I even be using Arch for this? Maybe Debian is more stable…

Sorry if this has been asked before. Thanks for any tips!

  • kixik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    artix, and honorific mentions to parabola and hyperbola (hyperbola is moving towards becoming a gnu + kopenbsd thing, like there was an attempt for a debian gnu + kfreebsd effort though this one got dropped)

  • ashenone@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    23 hours ago

    EndeavorOS is my go to for arch based systems. But with the archinstall script I’d say just give vanilla a go

  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    19 hours ago

    EndeavourOS. It’s like Arch, but a bit easier with a few automation and gui stuff builtin. It’s still heavy on terminal usage and it comes light out of the box. I switched from Manjaro to EndeavourOS, because Manjaro gave me some problems (especially their package manager and because of the AUR too, and I didn’t like the maintainers, no further comment). It’s my daily driver for years now. I use it for everything, daily usage, little programming, gaming on Steam and especially RetroArch too. I’m a huge RetroArch fan. :-) So if you plan to use base Archlinux or Manjaro, then I can recommend to use EndeavourOS a lot.

    Cachy OS is probably a good choice too, because their focus on performance optimizations. But they do also have a bit more, let’s say bloat, out of the box and their branding is a bit strong it seems. It’s a bit farther away from base Archlinux than EndeavourOS is.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I was teaching a friend Linux, by ways of running through the manual Arch installation process and finally got to be on the other side of the ‘Ok, now that we’ve spent a ton of time doing this the hard way, here(endeavorOS) is how you use tools to do it in 3 seconds’.

  • Admetus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Cachyos has a meta gaming package which will install steam, Lutris and a couple of launchers like heroic games launcher. Should have some extra optimisations as well. Lutris can install emulators too, as well as showing games in your steam library. I’m not sure if it can go full screen like retroarch and use a controller to select games, maybe it can.

  • ☭SaltyIcetea☭@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    aight let me tell you MY arch experience. itll be a long one.

    i first installed arch with the install script and later manually, i ran this setup for quite some time, and as time goes, small erros cascade into bigger ones. it got to the point where i was reconfiguring system configs every week to fix something that broke from an update. the thing that ultimately caused the most trouble was converting my existing ext4 system to btrfs. this caused all sorts of issue primarily with gaming performance (i had to disable cpu boosting in order to not have constant lag spikes for example). this old system was a mess held together with duct tape and hope, it broke with EVERY update, and not at small scales. at some point i had to reinstall grub everytime i changed something in my boot order. Ultimately i decided 2 days ago it was time for a reinstall. i tried installing it normally, i followed the official install instructions and got greeted by a grub shell. i fucked something up during the install, so i decided fuck it, i will use archinstall script again. then it took me legit 6 hours to get my system running in a way i could use it, tgen the next day an additional 3 to get everything set up so i can game with proper OBS recording and all.

    now i have a perfectly functioning Arch setup. and a lot more performance (even tho the setup should be the same, like i really dont know what was wrong with my old setup)

    arch WILL be a hassle at some point. in turn you get bleeding edge packages, no bloat, complete customisation, a great learning opportunity, the AUR, and (if properly set up) great performance.

    i like arch. i wouldnt use anything else.

  • mikael@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    If you don’t want to spend your time larping sysadmin I’d recommend one of the uBlue images as Kodi, Retroarch and Steam are available from Flathub. If you want to spend your time keeping your media center alive (and possibly learn something about Linux in the process), go ahead with Arch or any of its derivatives. I use Aurora, btw.

  • vortexal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I don’t have much experience with Arch but I did briefly use EndeavorOS in a virtual machine. While I didn’t use it enough to form a proper opinion on it, it did seem pretty good and it’ll probably be what I use if I need an Arch-based distro (which I think I might but I don’t remember what it was I needed Arch for).

  • glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    can someone who runs arch btw on weak hardware, like dual-core U-series i5 and such, tell me how they’re handling AUR and friends? every time I bring that up I get downvotes as if I’m some MICROS~1 agent paid to besmirch arch btw’s good name and whatnot…

    the idea that I hafta build and compile shit on a puny dual-core in 2026 is fucking ludicrous to me, never mind the bloat and cruft from all the build tools and deps for every possible stack. so what obvious solution am I missing? like, how do you handle a full system upgrade, say you got like ten things from AUR in addition to regular packages, what does that look like?

    • spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      One suggestion is to look for -bin versions of the packages you want. Those are precompiled and should install only marginally slower than a regular pacman package.

      • glitching@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        first time I heard of this, thanks. so running it thusly it’s no different than a copr or apt repo?

        • spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Not quite as that its user-created and submitted.

          But yeah lots of packages have a -bin counterpart that will install a lot quicker than compiling it for yourself.

  • darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    24 hours ago

    For a mediacenter that isn’t on bleeding edge hardware, fedora or Debian would be my choice for stability. Performance will be similar regardless of distro.

    I use arch on my desktop and laptop and Debian/Ubuntu on servers.

  • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I tried it, liked it, bricked my system, and now I enjoy EndeavourOS because it’s simple and easy.

  • abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I use plain Arch, but if you are just gonna use it as a media center, use Debian or something like it. A media center doesn’t need to be up to date if you’re just using it for TV and retro gaming. However, how mediocre are we talking? Are you intending to run full steam games or are you planning on streaming them from another computer?

    If the latter, I think Debian or even a healthy rPi running RetroPie might be up your alley because you can install Kodi and SteamLink on that.