Not strictly Linux…

But after reading about SystemD I realised that TempleOS would fall under the laws but there’s no way in hell that’s getting updated. There’s gotta be some amazing way to troll the lawmakers with this.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Yeah, and I’d say it’s a bit questionable whether California even has jurisdiction over revelations from God himself.

    Also, I don’t think it does networking and app stores 😄

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      there is a networking module in the Shrine fork. i think its internal name is “heretic” as it is against god’s will.

  • moody@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    15 hours ago

    TempleOS would fall under the laws

    So would DOS and Windows 95, but those haven’t had any updates in a couple years. Surely they’ll be updated to comply.

    • MissingGhost@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 hours ago

      FreeDOS’ latest version is from 2025. Guess they would be required to comply. They don’t even have user accounts…

      • cravl@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        If they actually read the Bible, they would never let a child near it go near a child.

        ftfy

  • fmtx@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    “Does anyone else find it weird that all the Linux users were born on Jan 1st, 1970?”

  • Labfox@lemmy.labfox.fr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    SystemD is only adding the possibility to store an age for the user, and the PR is being debated still