• Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    In my opinion, storing a date is pretty much irrelevant unless there’s a process that validates the supplied date, otherwise every Linux user was born on 1/1/1, if not, an administrator can “fix” that

    Furthermore, that systemd thinks that it’s the place to store such information is in my opinion beyond absurd.

    Who appointed that project the source of age truth in the Linux ecosystem? What discussion was there, who was consulted and where was the vote?

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You’re right that asking a user for a date is next to useless. However, that isn’t a reason to not fight this stuff. Asking the user for the date is step one to getting people accept it. After that they’ll point out that people were lying, and they’ll need our government ID to verify (and link us to activity). It’s all a step towards a surveillance network tracking every move you make on your computer.

      • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I understand your point and agree that this is the thin end of the wedge.

        What we’re doing here is discussing the phenomenon and I’m highlighting some concerns.

        I believe that this is how you get a dialogue happening which will effect change, which is what we’re both advocating.

        I think that age verification is about surveillance rather than protecting children and I think it should be fought at every level.

        This is me contributing to that fight.

    • skyline2@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Exactly. This is a massive overreach, and it is crazy that Poettering is even considering merging this.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        it is crazy that Poettering is even considering merging this

        You’ve, uh, seen systemd, right? Cmon; this is just one more section for the cancer to eat.

      • JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        I would say the majority of objections to systemd pertain to perceived overreaches of the project (perceptions I generally share). So in sense, it is kind of on brand.

      • Marasenna@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        18 hours ago

        and it is crazy that Poettering is even considering merging this.

        Not familiar with him then?

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They haven’t fessed up yet that that’s part of their plan. I expect to hear from them after they’ve passed the first half.

    • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      This change is mostly in the userdb code which is a sub-component of systemd that stores user records. It isn’t in the PID1 process. But I could see an argument for having it be part of the desktop environment in GNOME or something like that instead.