Plex is starting to enforce its new rules, which prevent users from remotely accessing a personal media server without a subscription fee.

If anyone needs it: https://jellyfin.org/

  • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Are there legal ways today to have your own media server serving new TV shows? I see the point if you’re sailing the high seas, but curios if there’s other uses for one (for videos)

    • Saltarello@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I have a couple of USB Hauppauge TV receivers in our HTPC which I use with NextPVR. I cut the ads from the recordings then bang them into Jellyfin

    • vividspecter@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s probably a TOS violation but you can combine it with pinchflat to strip ads and sponsored content from YouTube. It’s not a general YouTube app though, rather you use it to preserve channels you’re interested in.

      You can also use Jellyfin to serve legally purchased music from bandcamp etc, or movies and TV shows ripped from Blurays and DVDs.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Plex, Emby, and Jellyfin are all legal, and each have ways to serve liveTV alongside your own locally stored content, and DVR that liveTV if you want. You’d just have to purchase a liveTV subscription from your local provider (or go the Pirate route ofc).

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lol, guess who just made themselves a target. They are now profiting directly on people who stream content they don’t own from other people’s servers. Plex is going to go down when Hollywood sues them.

    • nixon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      I believe if the server hosting the content has a plex pass then end users are allowed to stream from it without any additional subscription or membership. At least that is how it was several months ago when they announced this.

      But you are right, even with the above being true, there will still be a non-insignificant portion of users paying to stream from servers.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Only old accounts are grandfathered into this for sharing libraries to other plex accounts.

        • nixon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          When did/does the grandfathering period end?

          I hadn’t heard that aspect of it before and would like to know more.

          Thank you for the info!

          • Kairos@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I don’t know maybe 2023?

            And the account had to have a Plex pass at the time.

            • nixon@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Ok, if you find any info on that please post it. I’m going to be on the look out for it and do the same if I find it.

              I’ve had a plex pass since before 2023 so this doesn’t affect me either way.

              But 2023 doesn’t sound right for when the grandfathering ended. I do not doubt that there is an end date for grandfathering but for that to have happened in 2023 sounds punitive towards their users and not a good long term strategy.

              Sure, enshittification and all that. I don’t doubt greed is the motive but they had to have known by ending grandfathering 2 years before implementing a policy like this would stir a user revolt and strengthen their competition. Especially with all the increased enshittification they have pushed out over those 2 years.

  • JTode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    (looks up from his floaty chair in his Jellyfin pool while sipping his fruity bittorrent cocktail) C’MON IN FOLKS THE WATER’S FINE!

  • ftbd@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Imagine hosting a software on your own hardware and still choosing the one that makes you dependent on the whims of a corporation lmao

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      When I first set up my server this year it was a VERY easy decision between this and jellyfin. Why would I ever go with the corporate, closed source option?

      • delcaran@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        In my case, I was not able to make jellyfin work: transcoding issues, lagging, client disconnection or unresponsive… Plex worked flawlessly out of the box with the same hardware and the same library.

        From time to time I try Jellyfin again, but things never change …

        • JTode@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Would you like help/guidance on your next attempt? It definitely works, but possibly not on corporate devices like Roku and such - I never did have a lot of luck with those, other than I think I had Jellyfin casting to a couple of Chromecasts we have kicking around. Not when the internet was out, of course, cause why would they keep working if Google can’t get their data on the spot?

          • delcaran@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Thank you, but it won’t be necessary. I think my issues are hardware -related, or simply my NAS is under too much load from other applications 😅 Other than that I should try with the Chromecast as you suggested, maybe the problem was the shitty client application…

            If I don’t succeed I’m still good with Plex, and I have a raspberry hanging around for an emergency Kodi.

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      *only for external streaming.

      You can cut it off from the internet and stream in your house locally for free still.

      End from any external streaming perspective, they are hosting a repository with your connection and port info, so your external friends can connect without you needing to manually configure or update their settings when you make a local change. Plus they are hosting stream relays for those that are unable to make a direct connection. To me, seems fair they’d ask for payment for that service.

  • Stillwater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I ultimately want to ditch Plex, but as an existing lifetime member, it currently handles everything so smoothly for my users that I don’t see enough benefits in switching. Particularly on the music streaming side (PlexAmp), I think the experience is the most polished one I’ve seen.

    My hope is that by the time the lifetime Plex Pass experience has become enshittified, Jellyfin will be more ready than it is today, and I’ll make a switch then.

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I ran Jellyfin and plex for a while, using Jellyfin instead of plex at every oppurtunity. Then Jellyfin broke, I couldn’t figure out how to fix it in an evening, and I just went back to using Plex, which had continued working. It isn’t great, sure, but it’s fine. I think Jellyfin would need to be Immich levels of cool, or plex would actually need to be unusable for me to switch.

      • tobz619@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m in the same boat, I have a Plex pass, I have my reverse proxy setup, Plex just works ™ and when it stops, Jellyfin is already installed and ready to go.

  • piyuv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve never used jellyfin, but do they also host proxy servers? AFAIK plex does and its costing them money, hence the need for paywalling this. You can still use tailscale and reverse proxy to allow remote streaming

    • Brewchin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      You can still use tailscale and reverse proxy to allow remote streaming

      I used to use Plex and when I discovered there was paid remote streaming function - that goes through their servers - my reactions were “Haha, no”* and checking whether my existing WireGuard setup would do it instead.

      Whaddya know, remote streaming using Plex and PlexAmp at no cost.


      *Not because I begrudge them recouping costs, but because it’s designed that way to justify charging for it, gives them whatever information they want from my viewing, and it’s not self-hosting if there’s any third party cloud/account component to it.

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Jellyfin does not host anything. With this change free Plex users behind a reverse proxy (or VPN) and Jellyfin users behind a reverse proxy (or VPN) work the same for remote access.

      The only difference is that Plex no longer provides expensive services for free, while Jellyfin never provided them.

      • piyuv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is my understanding and I’m surprised with the negative reaction. I think jellyfin is the better alternative being FOSS but this is not the reason.

  • menas@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Imagine, you software get massively used for piracy, and then you decide to ask for licence for the use of thir software, host on server you do not control. I suspect this will not be result they expected

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just wish Plex on my TV didn’t have this bug where it can’t play the correct audio track when Direct Play is enabled. So annoying.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    can’t wait for this to start. then maybe I won’t have to hear about it from the jellyfin shills every week.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The only reason I went with plex was easy remote access. Now with the state on reverse proxies and tailscale tunnels we happily ditched it.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Bought a lifetime Plex pass a few years ago so this doesn’t affect me. It’s honestly worth the cost especially over time.

    • scholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I also bought a lifetime Plex pass a few years ago, but I’ve migrated to Jellyfin because Plex is no longer a trustworthy project.

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Same. That’s for me a red flag that a company took the enshittification path and things will get progressively worse.

        Plus I would rather support an open source project that benefits the whole community than a greedy company who is trying to milk their customers.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Anybody still using Plex kind of deserves what they get at this point. They’ve been announcing these anti-consumer “features” for a while now.

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      People don’t deserve to be mistreated but it is surprising that folks haven’t abandoned it if they’re so actively anti consumer.

      • sixty@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Agree to disagree. When they actively and willingly go for the product that’s screwing them over.

        • buttnugget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Do you think that applies to you as well? That you deserve bad things to happen to you because of your consumer choices?

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I kind of understand why someone would honestly. Jellyfin subtitles are still a hot mess for a lot of formats unfortunately. Also, while plex has tried really hard to ruin their UI, I’ve still had more trouble explaining where to find things in Jellyfin. And if you’re sharing your collection with friends or family members there’s a lot more technical stuff involved.

      So I can see why the balance might still tip toward paying plex still for some people.

      Luckily I bought a lifetime license ages ago before the first price hike so this doesn’t affect me yet. So I’m just riding out the decline, running them in parallel until plex completely breaks. slowly transitioning the family as they get annoyed with broken features. Plexamp is quickly taking care of that 😅

    • De Lancre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Two years ago, when I found out that you need damn subscription, to watch YOUR stuff with transcoding on your device in local network, from your local server - I complained on reddit and a lot of people was disagree with me for harsh position.

      They_got_what they_focking_deserve.png

      • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lies. Local streaming never required a plex pass. Its for remote streaming only, but keep pushing that false narrative.

      • eah@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Pure rent seeking. It’s not the only example. So many products have artificial defects deliberately added by the manufacturer so that they can then charge you to disable the defect.

        • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          They deliver a working piece of software to you. They employ people to maintain it and add new features. They ask a price for this work.

          How is this rent seeking?

        • Buckshot@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Years ago now, they pushed an offer for lifetime subscription onto my server. I clicked it, went through to their website and bought it, paid, the subscription activated and worked.

          The next day they emailed to say actually i wasn’t eligible for the offer, they cancelled it and refunded me and said it would actually cost $30 more.

          I installed Jellyfin that same day, it was pretty buggy back then but was definitely the right decision.

      • Zanathos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Welcoming the incoming dowvotes for correcting your comment just like the many similar comments and posts I’ve seen on Reddit, but this is purely a configuration issue.

        Transcoding on local network is allowed without a subscription. If you are running your own DNS server (like pihole or unbound) you need to configure an internal “plex.direct” record. You also need to uncheck an option to “treat your WAN IP as internal” option which corrects double NAT issues.

        I have yet to see a need to move away from Plex. I paid for the cheap lifetime sub over a decade ago at this point and everyone I invite to my server has no complaints and has not had to pay Plex a dime. I don’t use their plex.tv proxy, I direct connect to my own IP and leave their remote proxy option off in the server and everything works great.

        I will check out Jellyfin at some point if Plex makes things more difficult in time, but for now these articles are literally just rage bait in the homelab ecosystem. They enacted this back in April of 2025 already!

        • kalpol@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I never checked to see what was actually in the logs but when i was running Plex, it constantly tried to send a lot of log data to its masters. That alone was enough to budge me up and get Jellyfin. Jellyfin isn’t as polished but it works perfectly fine for me.