• Olissipo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 day ago

    The post on Mastodon has a screenshot of the post edit history:

    Screenshot of a forum post, showing the versions before and after an edit. The sentence "I am queer, I am technically a furry too" was edited into "I am technically a furry too"

    And a copy-pasted response from a moderator (the most relevant bit):

    So in my opinion, if your intention was to show political support for diversity, you should avoid using this flag. This will allow us to refuse the use of a flag for instance saying ‘non-queer’, If we allow your flag, then we have to admit also other similar political flags, both supporting and opposing diversity.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      1 day ago

      “If we allow your flag, then we have to admit also other similar political flags, both supporting and opposing diversity.”

      Consider the following: no, they don’t.

          • comfy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            22 hours ago

            You have to understand, it just wouldn’t be fair to put inclusion over exclusion ! You care about equality, don’t you?

        • moomoomoo309@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Sure, up to the point where they harass someone or attack them, or have a history of doing so. A belief of “I think some people do not deserve to exist” is different from a belief of “People should be allowed to X” or “People who Y should not be harassed”. A nazi sympathizer who thinks nazis shouldn’t be attacked is fine, a nazi who attacks others is not.

            • moomoomoo309@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              I agree in principle, but you’re not going to win any battles with that mindset. They’ll just respond with “so much for the tolerant left”. Victimization is a beloved pastime for them.

              • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                15 hours ago

                A brick is approaching a Nazi’s teeth from an initial distance of 10m horizontally and a velocity of 10m/s. You may assume the absence of air resistance and treat the brick as a point mass.

                Calculate the initial angle(s) required to remove the most teeth and determine whether the Nazi can complain about the tolerant left before a brick removes their ability to speak.

                • moomoomoo309@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  This response is entirely unhelpful. Yes. Fuck nazis. I get it. This adds nothing. Nazis are bad, but we must coexist with them, lest we round them all up and get rid of them, which isn’t gonna happen. If it were that easy, we’d have done it already!

                  • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    9 hours ago

                    We may have to coexist with them from a logistical standpoint but we do not have to tolerate them. The paradox of tolerance is that we must not tolerate the intolerant.

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      1 day ago

      But why must they also allow bigotry if they allow people to express who they are? That is the biggest load of shit. So if I say “I have a husband of X years,” they must also allow someone to say a bunch of bigotry as a counter view?

      Or if I say I like open source software they must allow the trolls that want to call me a dirty hippie and tell me to get a job so I can pay for software? And I agree everything is political, and ignoring it doesn’t make it any less so.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 day ago

        I remember earlier this year when conservatives used autism to justify elon’s nazi salutes.

        Don’t be like that.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I take offense at this. I am autistic, this mod in question is just a bigot.

        What I want to know now is whether this mod is associated with Canonical in any capacity.

        On further research, this happened on the official Ubuntu boards, not Reddit as the link here implies. That makes this even more egregious. Canonical employees and official Ubuntu maintainers are responsible for this brazen homophobia. I gave up Ubuntu some time ago over Snaps and other creepy capitalist behavior, but this is a new low I didn’t expect from them.

        People, don’t use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or anything from Canonical. It you need Debian compatibility try Mint or Debian, otherwise try Fedora. Bazzite is also amazing if all you do is play games. Canonical is just as evil and corrupt as the other big companies.

        • Auth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m not sure why you’re moralizing so hard. I dont use ubuntu or any of their products.

          • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            In the first line I was attempting to make a joke, since I am autistic and the mod - or mods - clearly are bigots.

            The post-strikethrough comments aren’t directed at you, but at the disgusting behavior of Canonical. I’m sincerely sorry if I didn’t make that part quite clear. ☹️

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      That response does not appear on the Ubuntu site. There is no source on the mastodon paste.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          Okay, that’s pretty difficult to read but it’s something.

          But I checked the Ubuntu Discourse thread just now, and the statement “I am queer” has been restored by a mod. Hopefully the other mods are reminded of the policies they’re supposed to be following.