

No we don’t. Who needs that? That’s what consoles are for. Every time I want to play on my computer I would need to dual boot and change to the OS? That’s nonsense
Game Devs and device driver Devs need to get their shit together and fix things.
No we don’t. Who needs that? That’s what consoles are for. Every time I want to play on my computer I would need to dual boot and change to the OS? That’s nonsense
Game Devs and device driver Devs need to get their shit together and fix things.
How many NICs do you have on your opnsense machine?
And we all know Arch isn’t a distro right?
Their whole aesthetics is super cringe
But that’s the thing where you are wrong. They clearly state they don’t want C developers to learn Rust. In the particular video posted he was saying “I want you to explain to me how this particular API works so that I can do it”
The concerns about who fixes what on a merge when the C code breaks Rust code are valid, but that’s easily fixed by gathering with the Rust developers, explaining the changes and letting them fix it.
The issue is not agreeing, but behaving like an immature prick when arguing
What would be the advantages of using this over, say i3? (Does it summarize to X vs Wayland)
Console? Absolutely, but not PC. You’d remove all the versatility of owning a pc