

Yes, electricity is expensive here and I don’t use it daily.
Yes, electricity is expensive here and I don’t use it daily.
Yup. And it works already, as long as the server was shut down in the last few hours. Then it stops working. The 4 hours mentioned here seem about right.
Because I want the server to boot when a service on said server is being accessed. Without having to manually boot it before.
I’ll look into my options regarding a different switch or router, thanks.
However your solution with the ESP32 would require me to manually trigger the boot, no? At that point I can just use the magic packet, which works fine already.
I am talking about WoL in unicast mode, not with the magic packet.
Doesn’t make Gates a good person, even if that’s accurate.
In case you want to, here’s a link: https://youtu.be/sZcB4pD8gW4
You did see him praise trump at some kinda tech bro meeting in the white house the other day, right?
In fact my laptop is barely ever opened when I use it lmao
Yeah, I just don’t know what those terms mean lol
I was asking which one I need to choose to wake my server io whenever I try sending packets to it
Would that be multicast or broadcast activity? Or unicast?
Thanks for the tip regarding the IP segment, that seemed to be it. I needed to use the correct broadcast IP for the subnet (I think? I’m bad with networks. I used 192.168.2.255 instead of 255.255.255.255, and now it works)
And yeah, I am looking to get a router at some point. Hard to make such a purchase when I’m struggling to make ends meet currently, though.
How would this explain the packet not reaching the server in a powered on state?
Why not make one?
Or just use Debian
Do you need windows running on bare metal? I’m quite happy with a VM for all my windows usage. For example the mouse I use has a config tool that only works on windows
Nvidia drivers are a bit more of a hassle than amd but apparently bazzite does a good job at working out of the box with nvidia.
Do you think I didn’t read this? You obviously saw that I posted it in another comment, and I am mentioning info from the very text you posted here.
(Edit: I am realizing I am coming across as kinda hostile here, but I genuinely just want to understand your thought process behind posting this)
If you read the comments of the answer you copied, the OP of the question also said the following:
Them mentioning that one ‘may use one of both’ makes me believe there is a way to make this work properly with unicast. The serverfault post is also mentioning the need to manage several machines this way, which is why I believe the answer you copied suggested using broadcast, as managing ARP entries for several machines could become tedious and unreliable.