Precisely- it’s a concept that is ingrained in people to the point where anyone who doesn’t understand it is viewed as lacking. However, it’s needless.
I don’t need to understand IP addressing subnet routing to go to a website. Why should I need to understand a file and folder structure to find an old tax document?
You use an interesting example- personally, I feel like while files and folders have their place, I prefer they be part of the background and not presented to the user. Take photos, for example. If I’m looking for pictures of my dog, I don’t want to go into the 2022 folder, then the August folder, then look through all those files, back out into 2022 then go into the September folder, etc. I just want to type ‘dog’. Or pick from a dropdown list of common tags, or anything other than digging through files and folders.
It’s no longer accessible from a desktop, only from the Google Maps app.
The router is set as a subnet router, that is how I am able to access other machines on my lan remotely.
I don’t want to, and sometimes can’t, install tailscale on every device I want remote access to.
So I may have duplicate routes- Does that explain the behaviour in my original post? And how would I go about avoiding that?
I could turn off subnet routing, and only turn it on when needed, but I’ll be putting up a bunch of other services that will want to talk to each other- I’m assuming this will break whenever I turn subnet routing on.
I kind of follow what you’re putting down.
I am not using an exit node. How do I go about splitting my routes?
What I want to achieve is ‘normal’ access for within the lan, as well as remote access over tailscale for things I cannot run tailscale on.
I have a commercial VPN, but I am not connected. What tinkering did you have to do?
I set up subnet advertisements by doing tailscale set --advertise-routes=192.168.1.0/24. I did not touch ACL.
The home PC is Windows, the context menu for the tray app give the option to ‘use tailscale subnets’ which is enabled- I assume this is the equivalent of accepting advertised routes.
From the home PC, tailscale ping 192.168.1.2 returns a pong, from the tailscale IP. tracert fails.
Galene is webRTC based, but very lightweight.
Are humans based on apes or great apes?
I’m interested in why you chose the i5 for the automation, rather than the video server?
I’m no expert, but things like transcoding (or even just re-encoding) take a lot of grunt, which it seems the i5 would be good for.
The i3 would be good for more constant, lower power tasks like automation.
At least, that’s my thoughts, happy to be shown your reasoning…
They’re actually a pretty cool company- If you sent them an email clarifying their refund policy first, I’m sure they would refund you if it doesn’t do what you need it to.
Mint is not a version of windows.
I’m somewhat familiar with the tech used to display those boards, and I think the most efficient way to remove them would be to pass the image through an AI taught to scrub them out. And I understand how grossly inefficient that is.
The other option would be to get a ‘clean feed’ of the broadcast before the ads get overlaid- while technically this would be relatively easy, contractually it would be difficult, as the event host is paid to put ads in the broadcast. You’d essentially have to pay more than the advertisers do. This will still leave you with the ‘traditional’ ads, the physical signage and stuff written on the turf, etc.
You could potentially pay the stadium to have these removed, and if you bought the teams competing you could remove advertising from jerseys.
If enough people paid for a subscription, there’s the possibility of an ad-free sports league. I shudder to think of the price, though.
I have one in theirs, they have one in mine.
Wait, ease of installation? As someone who had to walk away from a semi-homebrew, mildly complicated cloud storage setup recently, that’s not the experience I had. Networks within networks, networks next to networks not talking to each other, mapped volumes, even checking logs is made more complicated by containerising. Sure, I’m a noob, but that only reinforces my point.
Oh, yeah, I understand now, thanks. That thing is UI/X design gone too far.
I haven’t daily driven OSX for a few years now, but I still miss it every time I use a control panel on any other system. It’s so functional, intuitive, logical, consistent, and not a pile of dogshit to look at. If I want to change my IP address, I go to network, ethernet, IP address. If it’s greyed out, there is a lock icon right there. I click it, put in admin details, and then I can change the IP. All in the same window, in a consistent, logical flow.
I don’t think I understand what you mean with the right click menu. Do you mean when right clicking, the menu that appears with things you can do there? Like right clicking a file, and being able to rename, or open with a different program, etc? Right click the desktop and get an option to change the desktop background? What’s the problem there?
It’s because the gui is designed to be navigated with the mouse. The idea that someone would use the mouse to select a file then use the enter key just didn’t cross anyone’s mind. If someone is using the keyboard in a GUI navigation, it’s probably for text entry- such as search, or renaming a file.
Telstra in Australia were at one stage providing routers to homes with a hidden SSID for their premium ‘public’ wifi.
I think it was solidly isolated from the home wifi, and did not eat into the homes speed quota, but still…