What exactly does the statement that Linux does not already “embrace the whole hardware” mean?
What exactly does the statement that Linux does not already “embrace the whole hardware” mean?
Yeah, there is nothing more annoying in general when starting to type text into a co-workers desktop than having random letters show up rather than having the cursor move around.
nano -> vim
This one is extremely consistent with the others because once you have made the switch, it becomes harder to escape.
This will finally be the year of the Wayland desktop!
The Software Publishers Association has finally won:
It is no longer possible to copy that floppy. :-(
Repeating my other reply verbatim yet again as you keep copying and pasting the same exact comment:
First, to be clear, this isn’t so much “press” as a blog entry. Second, there are only so many mentions of “rust cultists” and “my rust” I can read in a blog before losing interest.
Repeating my other reply verbatim as you just did the same:
First, to be clear, this isn’t so much “press” as a blog entry. Second, there are only so many mentions of “rust cultists” and “my rust” I can read in a blog before losing interest.
First, to be clear, this isn’t so much “press” as a blog entry. Second, there are only so many mentions of “rust cultists” and “my rust” I can read in a blog before losing interest.
Interesting! I had not even realized that this was a problem, though it makes sense now after your description. How realistically feasible is this type of approach, though, given that the manufactures can always just ignore the kernel’s request to reprogram them and continue to access the bus and memory directly?