

“old man tries to conceptualize modern reality”
“old man tries to conceptualize modern reality”
Let me try to clarify where I stand on that specific issue: I do not care how it comes around, but the point of innovation is for the commonwealth. I just think there needs to be appropriate protections from discouragement of time/resources investment, whatever that is. Too much protections and that’s discouraging. Too little is also discouraging.
Removing all copyright protections would essentially be a reset and would ultimately be a negative for society, even compared to now.
Now, on the trajectory that we’re making, we’re in a bad place and heading to a much worse place very quickly. We have to do something.
Getting rid of copyright protections entirely is not it. You must have protections for privacy and investment protections that encourage innovation. But where we are right now is entirely too far.
You must also consider AI as a pressing issue in ethics, with a WAY higher priority than copyright protections, but also with copyright protections as a variable.
Nothing is ever simple. Anybody who says anything is simple is manipulating you, and even the truth to that statement, itself, is complicated.
I don’t know what neo liberal is or what would order you claim we’re in.
I just know that a lot of people hate my opinion on how things should be. Conservatives lose their minds, liberals claim it’s impossible, and tankies get frustrated and think me naive.
All I know for sure is that nobody’s happier with the system than the people at the top and that’s bad.
And that conservatives don’t know what the fuck marxism is because they’re all illiterate and it drives me fucking crazy. Wait… Does that mean that conservatives are simultaneously the poorest and the richest in society?