• 0 Posts
  • 45 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle

  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldtoLinux@lemmy.mlReassessing Wayland
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I used Awesome about 5 years ago, and was extremely happy with it, unfortunately an upgrade of Awesome broke my scripts so nothing worked, and I didn’t have the time to be distracted and fix it. So I switched to XFCE.
    Pretty annoying to have many hours of work destroyed like that. If they have a promise now to not break compatibility with upgrades, I might consider trying it again. But I don’t care for a user environment that breaks completely because of changes in an upgrade.



  • Yes that’s annoying too, I have no clue why it does that, but when the sync says “clear”, I always wait a couple seconds, and run sync again a couple of times, to see if it’s actually finished. And only THEN unmount the stick.
    Copy to USB does not seem very solid on Linux IMO. So I also ALWAYS buy sticks with activity LED.
    But even that can fool you, sometimes when I think a smaller copy is finished, because the LED stops blinking, it suddenly starts up again, after having paused for about 1½ second?!?!



  • except linux waits on updating the UI until all write buffers are flushed, whereas Windows does not.

    I wish that were true here. But when I copy to USB the file manager ( XFCE/Thunar ) shows the copy is finished and closes the copy notifications way way before it’s even half done, when I copy movies to a stick.
    I use fast USB 3 stick on USB 3 port, and I don’t get anywhere near the write speed the stick manufacturer claims. So I always open a terminal and run sync, to see when it’s actually finished.

    I hate to the extreme when systems don’t account for write cache before claiming a copy is finished, it’s such an ancient problem we’ve had since the 90’s, and I find it embarrassing that such problems still exist on modern systems.


  • A standard boot system for Arm would have been awesome 10-20 years ago! I dreamed about that already back in 2005 when the OLPC idea was new, but when the netbooks finally came out, based on somewhat similar ideas, they were exclusively Intel!!!

    I must admit that after having waited in vain for 20 years now, I no longer give a shit. I cannot fathom how Arm didn’t create such a standard at least a decade ago?
    Initial Netbooks with Linux were very popular, but when vendors switched to a deprecated version of Windows, that ran way worse in every way, popularity of Netbooks actually dropped for a while, and the entire concept was basically declared dead. Because they were next to unusable compared to the early Linux Netbooks.

    Netbooks with Arm/Linux could have been HUGE!! But now the time has passed, because many use IOS or Android instead.


  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldtoLinux@lemmy.mlNew LTT video about linux.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    None of that ever happened

    It was so fucking obvious, how he was paid by companies to do some arbitrary shit, and later there would be a stellar review of their products.
    You had to be blind to not see it. It was hidden advertising, and it’s even illegal! But I think he changed his approach to make it BARELY legal now.

    He has since apologized, made the victim whole (or as whole as can be)

    Yeah after it became a scandal that hurt his business and reputation.


  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldtoLinux@lemmy.mlNew LTT video about linux.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Oh, does he still exist? I’ve blocked his channels, because he is simply not trustworthy. Everything he makes is at best infomercials. He’s a sellout.

    Edit:
    To those who downvote, really?
    It’s been so obvious already years ago, that his reviews depend heavily on who advertises with him. He was also called out on it, and even ADMITTED it! (Apologized) Then said he would be more open in the future. Note he didn’t say he would change, only that he would hide it less! Fool me once…
    Also the incident where he was a total asshole to a small cooler developer, and used the prototype wrongly, then wouldn’t deliver it back, despite that was the agreement, and it was a pretty expensive prototype to make for a small company, and then he auctioned it away!
    He was revealed to have behaved like an asshole all the way. But go ahead and support him if you want.










  • Corporate ownership, but you can have that and still be generally accepted in the community. Like both Fedora when controlled by Red Hat and Suse when controlled by Novell.
    One of the real problem is their dual license policy for their open source projects, that grant Ubuntu full license and the power to close in an Open source Project if they want. This is decidedly against the GPL spirit, but can be done with dual licensing.
    Another problem is the “not made here” mentality, which undermined Wayland for instance.
    Ultimately the problem is I guess, that Ubuntu is (was?) trying to make Ubuntu exclusive to Linux, with Canonical controlling key technologies. Seemingly an effort to reduce other Linux distros to second rate players.
    Another example of that (apart from dual license and Mir) is their new package system Snap, which is open source on the client side, but proprietary on the server side.
    Obviously it’s not a good idea for Linux to use proprietary package systems.

    These are of course ideological issues, if you don’t give a shit about those, I suppose Ubuntu is mostly OK. Except minor annoyances like media not working out of the box. And that the PPA system sucks.