• ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    People who live in California, if anyone bothers to enforce it, would have two options:

    1. Switch OSs to something that does comply, or
    2. Risk criminal actions for using their computer wrong

    It should be implemented as “This is only required if you live in California” during setup. However, this does sound completely unenforceable. If I have a connecting flight through LA, will they send a swat team to pick me up at the airport for not setting it up and using the WiFi?

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Would they actually go after the people?

      I expect the law would place the responsibility on the companies managing / distributing the OS. That’s the reason companies are complying. People can always look for alternatives… I’m sure there will always be homemade distros without stuff like this made by ragtag groups / communities without much of a corporate structure behind.

      • Inevitable Waffles [Ohio]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s one more tool in the bag that the State can wield against us. My more conspiratorial thinking as this as an accidental part of the frame work of how they create the slave knowledge worker class since anyone who actually works in tech will disable this. That way they can sweatshop devs into fixing bad AI code without paying them.