So a new major version of Debian has been released, and now I see a lot of complaints about various issues stemming from an upgrade. I do not remember this many after an LTS Ubuntu version. I don’t want to rush to conclusions like “Ubuntu has money for better quality assurance”. I can easily come up with explanations for why these statistics can be skewed, like “Ubuntu-loving plebeians do not come to complain to elite Lemmy users about their puny problems”. I’m curious what you think?

  • Frater Mus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Do you think servers have it easy compared to personal computers? No pesky audio/video cards, bluetooth, etc…

    My server upgrade to Trixie had no issues. That’s good because it’s several thousand miles away on another continent… My laptop had a few burps with ranger, jekyll, and autokey that required googling.

    my experience so far

    I see a lot of complaints about various issues stemming from an upgrade. I do not remember this many after an LTS Ubuntu version

    Selection bias? I suspect Debian folks are more likely to notice problems and start looking for bug reports, talking about it, etc. Like my dorky blog entry above.

    • arty@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thank you! This selection bias was one of the possibilities I’ve considered…