• SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    It’s sad, because for most people the use-case for an m-dash is relatively narrow—a parenthetic interjection relevant to the topic (but not sufficiently off-topic for brackets), and needing a subtle call to authority—it mostly popped up in academic or pseudo intellectual non-fiction, or in faulknerian ponderous fiction, but also as a hapless crutch for endlesss neurodivergent layers of qualification.

    So I am going to claim disability discrimination about this brutal and unjust sudden boycott, on behalf of crew #adhd.

    Edit: shits and giggles

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      but also as a hapless crutch for endlesss neurodivergent layers of qualification.

      I both resent and resemble that remark.

      • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I just realized that I could have double-layered the m-dashes there, eh? Missed opportunity. Oh what the hell, I need to prolong lunch break juuust a little bit more, so

    • vividspecter@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I just overuse parantheses instead, as you noted. You know you’re rambling when you have several layers of them, like I’m writing a conversation in Lisp.

    • ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Ok, you gave a way more reasonable response than the other guy. Thank you for your input; it sucks when something near and dear to you is “taken away” or bastardized in some way.