• ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    “One symptom does not make a diagnosis.”

    Read what I wrote again, slowly. Ask ChatGPT to summarize if you need to: “However, ChatGPT uses it excessively and so now it is a sign of its writing. Practically speaking you should avoid it in your future writing, since no one really cares if it is a false positive or not.”

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Anti-intellectualism as a defence. Nice. Abandon grammar and take language where an LLM can’t follow. Surely we’ll be able to tell a text written by a human from one written by a machine if the human writes it like a dumbass, I can’t see anything wrong with that. i mean why even use proper punctuation and capitalization an ai wouldnt write sumthin like dis isnnnt it better you can tell a human wrote dis

      Have I made my point?

      • ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Anti-intellectualism… lol?

        Anyways if you go back to my original comment, you’ll see that my original Javascript comments were written as advice towards prospective blog / site owners, in an attempt to get them to create something UX friendly. My comments on LLM are an extension of that: if you use AI (or write closely to AI) to write your blog you’ll just shake your readers’ confidence.

        I have no idea where you got anti-intellectualism from, you’ll have to show me the hat you pulled that from sometime. That said you can substitute em dashes, they don’t hold dominion over the English language lol

        Edit: Oh you edited your comment without putting an Edit line. The above was a reply to your original comment. I’m not changing mine

        Also weird:

        • Claims anti-intellectualism
        • Gives slippery slope reasoning

        Again, can’t make this up